<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rosen Properties Blog &#187; banks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rosenprop.com/blog/tag/banks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rosenprop.com/blog</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:20:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Banks vs. Trees</title>
		<link>http://www.rosenprop.com/blog/2010/07/16/banks-vs-trees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rosenprop.com/blog/2010/07/16/banks-vs-trees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 04:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dick Rosen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loan Modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan mod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short Sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosenprop.com/blog/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I heard a story today about a real estate investor working on a rehab in a state different than where he lived, I&#8217;m not sure but I think it was Florida.  The state is irrelavant to my story but the law mentioned made me think.  This investor wanted to cut down a tree to improve his curb appeal until [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard a story today about a real estate investor working on a rehab in a state different than where he lived, I&#8217;m not sure but I think it was Florida.  The state is irrelavant to my story but the law mentioned made me think. </p>
<p>This investor wanted to cut down a tree to improve his curb appeal until he found out that local law required anyone cutting down a tree is then required to plant 3 trees&#8230; Wow, stiff but I like it!  Needless to say the investor opted to simply trim the existing tree.</p>
<p>I really think that banks, in particular those banks working on foreclosures, short sales and loan modifications, should be required to plant 3 trees for every file worked on and not approved.  I&#8217;m currently working on 3 loan modifications. I&#8217;ve had to refax the same documents multiple times because&#8230; maybe the T&#8217;s weren&#8217;t crossed correctly?  Then I call back the following week to follow up only to find out that I have to resubmit <span style="text-decoration: underline;">UPDATED</span> docs because the first set is now outdated.</p>
<p>These institutions should be held accountable somehow for their wastefull practices and pure neglect for our natural resources not to mention the huge waste of the consumers resources&#8230; it is simply idiotic!  I have confronted them about this and they reply that they are completly electronic&#8230; they obviously don&#8217;t realize that the consumers are not typically as electronic as a billion dollar bank&#8230; we need to print a hard copy in order to fax it in!  And, they won&#8217;t except emails you have to fax it in! </p>
<p>They should have to plant 3 trees for every file they start and don&#8217;t approve!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rosenprop.com/blog/2010/07/16/banks-vs-trees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

